Log in
or
Join
.
Web
|
Video
|
Texts
|
Audio
|
Projects
|
About
|
Account
|
TVNews
About TV
Help
Feedback
Sort:
Relevance
Most Recent
Oldest
More search options
Search just the current recording:
contains
does not contain
contains
does not contain
contains
does not contain
contains
does not contain
Network:
Station:
Program Title:
Language:
Chinese
English
Esperanto
Filipino
French
Hebrew
Korean
Spanish
Date Range:
From:
To:
BORROW
BROADCAST SUMMARY
SHARE CLIP
Simply click and copy the url below to share this clip:
CSPAN2 SITE
00:00
If you
log in
or
join us
, you could
Add a Comment
Cancel
00:00
0
said:
BORROW
copyrighted work
Tonight From Washington
September 27, 2012 8:00pm-11:00pm EDT on
CSPAN2
0 comments
Clips viewed 81 times
News/Business. News.
Extracted Topics
faa
60
us
19
u.s.
13
texas
13
nexgen
11
united states
11
california
9
fisa
8
kagan
7
massachusetts
7
america
5
memphis
5
dr. dillingham
5
roberts
4
maryland
4
nextgen
4
doma
4
metroplex
3
petitioner
3
mr. costello
3
Broadcast Summary
00:00
movement
empirical
00:30
act
court
supreme
upcoming
federalist
society
action
affirmative
decisions
universities
likely
today
including
rights
hears
marriage
previewed
defense
voting
term
public
01:00
afternoon
inaudible
conversations
oral
first
many
argument
hour
term
half
01:30
today
little
sponsored
societies
yummy
chinatown
somethings
menu
court
waist
groups
behalf
food
matter
things
supreme
chinese
society
federal
term
program
welcome
lawyers
regular
faculty
chapter
congo
example
lunches
cox
pardoned
promises
division
luncheon
event
practice
september
different
doug
02:00
today
important
colleague
news
journalist
discussion
lead
correspondent
many
well
among
right
long
storm
panel
nbc
meant
known
along
things
bush
versus
abrams
dan
pulled
experts
justice
evening
comp
december
grateful
ago
decision
williams
thoughts
insights
gore
together
moderator
reporting
pete
02:30
introduce
graduated
wainstein
washington
prosecutor
university
uva
top
ken
york
each
speak
party
refer
spent
whole
school
career
making
library
federal
playboy
spierer
america
getting
serious
declared
attorney
virginia
panelist
magazine
03:00
position
security
assistant
president
catch
dangerous
department
much
10
panel
chief
thanks
lawyer
2006
robert
please
fbi
george
breath
became
starts
event
served
adviser
new
private
general
justice
mueller
staff
playboy
attorney
fill
national
magazine
homeland
watching
brand
practice
director
reference
bush
03:30
act
case
amendment
called
national
security
fisa
cases
passed
ve
let
2008
1978
talk
three
start
asked
mimic
proper
versus
fantasy
foreign
regular
standing
criminal
relating
challenge
understand
substantial
intelligence
generational
surveillance
04:00
standing
challenge
activists
attorneys
understand
plaintiffs
bit
span
case
right
civil
party
issue
court
ahead
people
merits
little
appear
things
others
rights
regular
statute
whether
contact
question
actually
watching
overseas
04:30
surveillance
people
picked
standing
challenge
electronic
law
might
case
right
court
issue
merits
course
allows
dealing
talking
subject
federal
claiming
directed
overseas
concerned
therefore
government
dedication
challenging
wiretapping
particularly
05:00
05:30
court
designed
reviewing
government
wiretapping
communications
in
hadn
1978
ended
tried
using
ruled
limit
states
united
agency
others
effort
inside
focused
statute
problem
require
national
congress
password
security
06:00
communications
technology
problem
parameters
particular
surveillance
1978
ones
radio
fiber
optic
wired
people
states
united
cables
trying
change
outside
wiretap
statute
require
defining
dramatic
required
referred
satellite
06:30
fisa
court
order
surveillance
requirements
electronically
11
try
much
many
face
world
result
intent
change
leading
routing
someone
wiretap
changed
actually
overseas
instances
electronic
government
surveilled
indications
requirement
07:00
act
2008
overseas
government
surveillance
intelligence
set
fisa
court
basis
allow
night
trying
special
someone
believe
statute
amendment
different
radically
amendments
permission
commission
surveilled
reasonable
07:30
people
surveillance
plaintiffs
communication
communicating
communications
case
swept
state
might
meant
every
maybe
number
states
course
merits
picked
united
couple
special
outside
forward
someone
thought
problem
questions
medication
permission
08:00
whether
court
issue
standing
reasonable
wiretapped
communication
ruled
fisa
communicate
torre
plaintiffs
conducted
served
narratives
incidentally
supreme
review
wait
climate
08:30
people
travel
injury
concern
overseas
recommendation
meet
care
claim
money
might
maybe
entry
avoid
others
picked
really
killing
clients
spending
illusory
different
therefore
government
intercepted
09:00
might
mafia
standing
challenge
surveillance
communications
crime
valid
entry
issue
thing
family
direct
picked
concern
wiretap
statute
clients
attorney
criminal
wiretaps
otherwise
electronic
wiretapped
government
09:30
obviously
following
enormously
litigation
reauthorization
unconstitutional
act
fisa
fair
play
fact
court
state
filed
allow
found
finds
saying
letter
effort
letters
general
prevail
forward
attorney
standing
amendment
undermine
10:00
intelligence
important
undermine
challenged
terrorists
challenges
lead
able
find
cite
tool
case
mean
court
cases
grams
second
people
effort
lesser
concern
threats
secrets
foreign
national
injuries
standing
probably
programs
10:30
likely
probably
resolving
separation
last
legislative
intelligence
lines
guess
issue
drawn
cases
shift
thing
found
global
issues
powers
branch
policy
around
judges
courts
gritty
brought
opposed
similar
standing
programs
case
dramatic
executive
important
11:00
case
versus
called
criminal
basically
straightforward
force
court
cases
minds
round
extent
states
united
bailey
fairly
fourth
got
decide
ruling
docket
supreme
briefly
mention
1981
sommers
national
question
sevellon
justices
michigan
sort
security
amendment
forefront
11:30
search
warrant
police
premises
defendant
residence
away
case
rule
right
walks
coday
sorry
issue
states
follow
detain
nation
extends
premise
whether
stopped
argument
executed
happened
somebody
distance
informant
occupants
12:00
police
search
premises
drug
warrant
location
car
stop
mile
went
left
saw
right
house
there
dealer
before
certain
god
another
fitting
dealing
himself
trouble
brought
got
followed
executed
informant
defendant
operating
statements
key
connecting
surveilled
description
12:30
found
people
summers
illegally
rationale
conducted
mile
away
guns
rule
house
moved
apply
drugs
played
arrest
seized
placed
patient
opinion
applied
stopped
argument
evidence
claiming
officers
premises
suppress
certainly
13:00
police
people
search
keeping
distracting
justifications
pay
away
wait
cited
apply
danger
driven
minute
fleeing
warrant
petition
location
premises
distract
authority
therefore
13:30
search
ve
warrant
disrupting
conducting
governments
got
age
text
away
cell
call
worry
phone
turned
safety
flight
around
driven
couldn
gotten
concern
affairs
officer
response
concerns
everybody
happening
14:00
stop
rule
government
reasonably
practicable
significance
soon
seen
long
tape
summer
course
search
leaves
warrant
someone
ability
reverse
applies
incident
proposing
expansion
extension
residence
advocating
14:30
win
stop
government
legitimate
admissible
reasonable
area
went
talk
right
valid
final
kerry
thing
stuff
argue
issued
search
defense
summers
despite
chained
victory
footnote
evidence
maryland
apparent
suspicion
therefore
defendant
15:00
case
maryland
arrested
amendment
collection
surreptitiously
27
half
king
laws
right
sales
state
mouth
swabs
allow
people
states
fourth
versus
minute
search
inside
another
federal
granted
pending
question
validity
15:30
swap
gets
case
system
checked
arrested
old
hit
put
help
rape
hurt
king
laws
mouth
crimes
charge
inside
federal
swathed
anybody
officers
burglary
identify
maryland
possibly
allowing
believed
profiled
defendant
installed
government
16:00
rape
law
people
suppress
convicted
invalidating
26
swab
gets
life
court
swabs
found
states
school
appeals
results
thereby
charged
maryland
allowing
swapping
arrested
sentenced
generally
challenged
ultimately
connection
imprisonment
16:30
defendant
versus
privacy
intrusive
government
fingerprinting
dna
swab
terms
court
mouth
people
having
profile
appeals
process
concern
focused
balance
accepted
maryland
arrested
subjected
17:00
profile
interest
government
responded
interested
particularly
dna
kind
state
match
traits
intact
search
strong
exposed
allowed
privacy
genetic
samples
arguing
shouldn
anything
determine
defendant
17:30
dna
crimes
strong
ability
government
institutions
need
sold
case
fact
looks
swabs
around
granted
samples
besides
whether
country
balance
charged
interest
argument
identify
database
arrested
committed
essentially
18:00
much
people
crimes
exonerating
publication
high
tremendously
name
held
paper
thank
ken
legal
every
panel
taylor
better
glossy
run
stuart
commit
stakes
process
staples
affairs
big
written
finding
printed
together
virtually
important
next
prediction
commentary
incriminate
18:30
book
action
affirmative
sometimes
practices
warn
universities
law
rush
grad
court
title
duke
issue
great
hurts
admit
wrote
lawyer
help
author
degree
entire
taking
called
supreme
case
harvard
preaches
intended
students
mismatch
judgment
term
lacrosse
summarize
princeton
co
19:00
case
action
affirmative
confession
assignment
co
university
10
bias
2003
heard
texas
court
since
brief
start
helps
filed
spend
argued
author
minute
crazed
friend
stuart
written
october
fortune
homework
includes
requires
corporate
19:30
often
students
university
preferences
competitive
environments
bi
ill
fans
rick
ball
case
brief
state
black
argue
racial
versus
harmed
amicus
sandra
warning
briefly
without
compete
disclose
academic
prepared
hispanic
workplace
harassment
20:00
case
affirmative
respectable
established
composition
unconstitutional
ever
ways
debt
court
issue
texas
argue
simply
racial
system
reason
fisher
change
action
become
supreme
country
students
arguments
important
previously
principles
preference
university
20:30
court
fairly
action
michigan
university
affirmative
case
wide
law
anti
long
door
2003
plan
split
every
level
model
things
around
school
served
opening
notably
country
holistic
preference
preferences
universities
21:00
school
racial
preferences
replaced
principles
undergraduate
lay
law
fair
wins
2005
texas
wrote
sandra
mainly
reason
connor
expand
retired
justice
medical
opinion
restrain
entrench
reported
kruetter
21:30
racial
cases
solid
justice
kennedy
preferences
four
votes
vote
sits
case
many
alito
write
favor
middle
joined
points
clearly
majority
critical
justices
probably
kruetter
preference
conservative
22:00
racial
point
interest
diversity
compelling
educational
met
show
kind
number
failed
enough
called
narrow
kennedy
benefits
dissented
necessary
tailoring
justifying
forcefully
principles
preference
university
requirement
substantial
22:30
racial
majority
principles
preference
university
alternatives
far
bart
laid
much
race
mayor
given
court
means
serve
claims
seeking
briefly
neutral
balance
actually
resorted
exhausted
deference
interests
diversity
23:00
racial
kruetter
proportions
preferences
universities
internationally
25
28
gone
24th
kate
wait
stop
last
nine
fact
years
court
state
large
expect
cordon
groups
logical
various
anymore
statement
necessary
perpetual
obligation
population
23:30
university
preferences
institution
representing
establishment
organizations
sign
case
major
every
extent
within
racial
groups
fisher
worked
larger
stakes
slowing
tension
country
opinion
internal
hundreds
kruetter
anything
contrary
virtually
24:00
side
america
contrast
university
establishment
organizations
lot
brief
worse
17375
texas
small
people
racial
better
bought
mostly
amicus
groups
retired
weighed
totally
hundreds
advocacy
american
military
corporate
preference
educational
preferences
conservative
24:30
racial
institutions
illustrates
preferences
run
disapproved
establishment
poll
wide
five
peace
issue
makes
clear
large
people
public
moment
amicus
always
margin
reasons
current
perhaps
various
formula
operate
stunning
justices
american
disconnect
preference
25:00
never
racial
justice
interest
compelling
preference
case
may
plan
sense
fifth
issue
regime
upheld
struck
banned
connor
earlier
kennedy
thought
question
michigan
kruetter
contrary
entirely
mentioned
justified
somewhere
university
identified
preferences
25:30
case
court
preferences
interesting
lot
conservative
justification
law
wasn
talk
bound
meets
means
thing
follow
racial
chance
school
either
supreme
liberal
experts
granted
greater
assured
kennedy
whether
standing
michigan
problems
certainly
university
26:00
grant
case
whack
obviously
affirmative
publication
foe
four
book
else
sore
votes
takes
eager
order
people
little
ruined
remind
action
granted
kennedy
granting
schedule
26:30
action
argument
affirmative
kennedy
justices
preferences
10
yes
end
four
navy
find
plan
oral
force
whack
train
maybe
racial
really
decided
justice
october
27:00
tied
hands
grutter
unanimous
preferences
rehearing
16
hate
hand
bank
left
seven
fifth
court
grant
voted
panel
scores
racial
judges
uphold
upheld
choice
supreme
reverse
circuit
opinion
mustered
including
reluctant
basically
27:30
court
concurrence
information
best
preferences
motivations
speculation
guys
whack
texas
garza
judge
sides
maybe
think
result
racial
really
rather
quotas
strong
supreme
message
wrecked
sending
numbers
argument
whatever
strategic
low
arguments
everything
university
28:00
top
case
texas
number
admitted
university
10
high
plan
kids
many
based
issue
every
people
racial
blacks
things
school
called
targets
involved
committed
challenge
hispanics
basically
individual
requirement
preferences
28:30
population
racial
hispanics
representation
approaching
proportional
set
need
true
side
group
large
based
texas
heads
coming
target
grutter
numbers
whatever
explicit
specific
arguments
university
preferences
29:00
racial
balancing
university
sounds
objectives
guess
represented
need
engaged
implication
connor
sure
justice
asians
lot
already
yet
certainly
fewer
texas
cite
29:30
years
mass
every
class
justice
critical
16
50
200
100
done
within
either
connor
limits
grutter
kennedy
minority
students
supposed
depending
remaining
university
substantial
representation
30:00
case
10
extremely
individual
preferences
substantial
top
law
plan
point
large
state
might
wants
leave
makes
racial
adding
double
already
fischer
threads
achieved
analysis
arguments
diversity
admitting
30:30
standards
31:00
case
brief
low
large
part
reason
may
trouble
turn
competing
summarize
kids
gaps
end
31:30
november
supervisor
harassment
precedents
26
vicariously
characteristics
vii
fear
race
among
court
title
based
versus
render
agreed
second
argued
review
courts
gender
liable
supreme
appeals
federal
briefly
employer
justices
conflict
protected
pervasive
32:00
centers
unseemly
something
full
liability
difference
cosmetically
part
five
votes
three
big
kagan
scope
might
wouldn
little
taking
text
matter
justice
opposed
briefly
matters
imagine
much
advance
reverse
clarify
kennedy
without
circuit
2011
stewart
decision
employer
32:30
justice
court
university
manchester
department
yes
supporting
law
four
next
full
okay
wins
thank
tybee
brief
state
kagan
texas
clerk
quart
reason
amicus
inside
supreme
general
refused
analyst
obvious
presided
clarence
solicitor
33:00
judicial
advocates
categories
eye
linguistics
conservative
organization
may
help
much
cast
legal
favor
kerry
cases
thank
chief
thomas
carrie
crisis
issues
writes
speaks
degree
policy
values
network
counsel
nominees
director
severino
documents
33:30
cases
yet
marriage
proposition
interesting
predilection
sex
feel
cave
play
talk
share
sense
court
field
talked
likely
issues
krantz
angles
others
actual
rights
voting
granted
aspects
exactly
34:00
cases
states
marriage
recognize
proposition
relationship
act
less
turn
main
dome
1996
talk
angle
state
likely
forced
little
passed
trying
second
provide
protect
federal
defense
history
probably
sections
different
government
34:30
federal
section
law
purpose
marriage
challenged
man
host
word
wife
laws
three
legal
woman
means
cases
taxes
union
whole
defend
defense
spouses
husband
purposes
declined
opposite
recently
famously
although
president
35:00
defense
administration
abdicated
petitions
assistance
technically
paul
able
role
cnet
task
house
group
front
legal
court
cases
course
decide
engaged
several
amongst
clement
license
created
advisory
probably
defending
35:30
marriage
different
commercial
protection
combination
massachusetts
act
jail
human
basis
three
cases
equal
office
runner
clause
argued
health
either
defense
section
violates
combined
rational
services
36:00
case
level
question
scrutiny
involved
confirmation
idea
past
part
event
court
kagan
happy
argue
office
general
justice
hearing
recused
district
strategy
internal
solicitor
discussion
interesting
36:30
scrutiny
heightened
resources
basically
additional
officially
tax
act
sort
cuts
read
real
doma
case
ended
cases
level
found
rolled
defense
wrinkle
listing
circuit
creating
kindness
marriage
37:00
court
supreme
petition
appealed
appropriate
consideration
end
seem
week
used
case
last
onto
ready
tries
level
figure
really
taking
action
review
concern
holding
regroup
neglect
decision
scrutiny
appellate
conference
bipartisan
37:30
case
filed
called
massachusetts
casecommotions
ve
unconstitutional
yet
doma
ninth
steve
court
grant
guild
office
review
versus
another
justice
finding
circuit
argument
decision
petition
district
personnel
appellate
management
government
department
california
recommended
38:00
case
court
granted
overriding
interesting
read
extraordinary
11
rule
saved
grant
kagan
ll
cases
timely
really
please
enough
things
set
supreme
fashion
certain
another
justice
vehicle
may
recused
totally
resolve
consider
national
judgment
sure
language
shorthand
importance
38:30
case
court
unconstitutional
thinking
marriage
department
won
act
kagan
filed
clear
found
course
really
appeal
rather
reason
voting
already
defense
justice
suggest
standing
actually
petition
appealed
hesitant
39:00
case
cases
additional
everything
petitioner
petitioned
won
got
york
apply
court
verse
issues
review
versus
winsor
others
wanted
appeal
called
supreme
vehicle
several
serious
problem
peterson
standing
opposite
personnel
management
39:30
case
justice
circuit
department
california
net
massachusetts
bush
york
turn
onto
laws
court
state
valid
kagan
might
views
boils
great
clear
really
better
yet
supreme
reasons
everyone
unlikely
canadian
vehicles
lot
marriage
marriages
conducted
40:00
risk
case
concerns
situation
perfectly
unpleasant
may
aren
full
doma
court
appeal
wouldn
strong
equally
reasons
another
vehicle
running
enacted
whether
serious
urgency
decision
question
40:30
election
conference
altogether
fine
considered
nonetheless
20
connecticut
call
part
york
case
yet
issue
means
court
cases
haven
ahead
end
fully
dealt
pushes
really
rather
winsor
run
decide
holding
october
november
peterson
justices
sees
finished
earliest
briefing
41:00
proposition
court
announced
iterations
california
particular
22
sex
lie
low
case
state
chief
things
rather
ensure
already
justice
granted
quickly
several
history
campaign
marriage
familiar
factored
political
41:30
sex
marriages
california
constitution
simultaneously
unconstitutional
52
sql
man
court
found
clause
passed
already
amending
actually
majority
provides
prepared
marriage
requires
election
performed
referendum
protection
proposition
42:00
case
judge
court
allegations
interesting
sort
sensational
shut
ended
plays
woman
tried
great
trial
broad
coming
trying
ruling
walker
managed
decided
finding
sitting
lot
getting
history
district
presents
surprise
questions
john
propriety
publicize
ultimately
42:30
marriage
sex
right
basically
protection
constitution
man
must
took
case
ninth
state
woman
every
allow
clause
merely
define
states
cursor
brought
destroy
circuit
mandated
laughter
inaudible
43:00
rational
scrutiny
tailored
upholding
reinhardt
basically
law
much
books
looks
basis
state
broke
judge
ground
appeal
matter
narrow
already
justice
address
kennedy
whether
uniquely
decision
43:30
people
right
class
removing
eliminate
difference
sex
saw
mind
gets
seems
makes
except
assert
reason
engage
sorted
immense
despite
pearson
rational
scrutiny
specific
marriage
44:00
right
ratchet
history
citizens
california
continually
set
due
one
way
fair
away
week
fact
court
aside
found
whole
block
courts
trying
matter
finding
44:30
away
case
required
situation
california
petitioned
one
way
cant
much
call
rise
apply
court
shoot
means
never
mostly
narrow
supreme
decided
ratchet
grounds
possible
45:00
staircase
precedent
precedents
persuasive
interpreted
controlling
ve
10
done
kind
fact
evans
ninth
court
worry
issue
romer
judge
takes
viewed
except
quirky
versus
common
brought
circuit
opinion
approve
reinhardt
45:30
case
decided
marriage
president
challenge
sex
controlling
may
law
man
area
main
gave
hand
court
verse
taken
woman
baker
likely
courts
nelson
supreme
quickly
summary
similar
arguably
defining
dismissal
minnesota
concerned
seriously
46:00
voting
section
act
five
rights
discriminatory
set
main
stop
keep
voter
front
cases
clear
taxes
runner
turned
better
listed
trying
prevent
another
forbids
attacks
sections
designed
defection
practices
shakespeare
workarounds
discrimination
46:30
voting
jurisdiction
department
suppressed
presumption
preclearance
tax
put
ago
1864
rolls
voter
state
wrong
using
ahead
unless
change
rights
justice
covered
improper
eligible
probably
requires
something
practices
basically
47:00
years
five
reauthorizing
integration
registration
discrimination
ve
25
fix
try
less
mess
kept
1970
race
onto
fixed
racial
things
couple
gotten
limited
another
suggest
fighters
reactive
analysis
relations
perpetual
optimistic
authorized
47:30
1972
whether
municipality
preclearance
discriminate
jurisdictions
nsn
test
real
heavy
since
state
court
lines
burden
voting
covered
problem
argument
whatever
changing
anything
required
suggested
regulatory
jurisdiction
48:00
preclearance
voter
indiana
reasonable
differently
particularly
much
case
court
texas
times
hauled
states
system
upheld
higher
matter
process
affects
routine
several
totally
similar
example
standard
challenge
48:30
higher
majority
standards
minorities
town
legislation
nonpartisan
give
hire
based
since
black
held
texas
north
today
allow
faces
covers
1872
states
others
change
county
matter
certain
1965
several
refused
matters
example
minority
problems
part
carolina
challenge
elections
doj
49:00
case
apparently
department
petitioned
challenging
nonetheless
sad
got
area
main
moved
level
voters
proper
wanted
change
appeal
process
justice
finally
reviews
accounted
49:30
requiring
officials
disclosure
criticizing
jurisdiction
preclearance
sad
doj
ask
full
case
1965
five
group
since
brief
filed
covers
county
shelby
things
amicus
former
behalf
states
another
section
alabama
changes
facially
50:00
case
issue
likely
preclearance
couple
challenging
law
voter
nonetheless
working
2011
passed
gained
less
reject
enacted
cases
games
taken
50:30
jefferson
suggested
court
unanimous
situation
west
litigation
redistricting
texas
south
versus
costly
week
skynet
curiam
per
little
tipped
trying
states
hand
county
called
may
process
justice
earlier
enacted
time
kennedy
treated
bit
contacts
decision
question
virginia
house
concerns
carolina
consuming
past
51:00
keep
senses
difference
variations
reasonable
reorganizing
got
size
shut
based
court
county
things
slight
entire
states
factors
example
district
counties
together
deference
perfectly
basically
districts
51:30
specifies
panelists
court
goldstein
involvement
next
legislatures
indispensable
state
cases
people
direct
blog
judges
enough
15
scotus
coming
affect
gather
stop
supreme
process
one
edition
suggest
section
instead
must
website
towards
tom
earlier
present
created
leaning
talk
obscure
probably
whenever
code
52:00
court
thank
lawyer
accurately
specializing
organization
pete
28
june
free
care
msrp
tom
spent
young
cases
people
turned
number
got
states
handed
united
better
health
worded
fast
ruling
supreme
society
federal
million
decision
much
justices
described
remarkable
25
52:30
cases
sex
rights
voting
journalist
unbelievable
job
act
done
form
case
talk
legal
issues
little
boyers
points
comment
serving
tonight
nations
business
justices
marriage
principal
announced
describing
incredibly
53:00
cases
court
little
federal
straighten
illustration
step
rule
toma
takes
raise
job
works
states
likely
united
appeal
voting
100
rights
supreme
appeals
slivers
several
statute
act
famously
involved
mentioned
validated
generally
judiciary
tiny
basically
predicted
permission
53:30
case
interest
different
suggested
obviously
constitutionality
lot
men
act
code
sits
ways
point
right
court
issue
dodgy
might
almost
second
expect
wonder
center
rights
voting
pivotal
kennedy
justice
serious
justices
concerns
54:00
worldview
university
possibility
affirmative
constitution
conservative
sex
law
may
ally
real
head
space
every
texas
action
vision
rightly
liberal
justice
program
kennedy
marriage
community
suspicion
confidence
disconnect
54:30
individuals
hand
people
hispanic
anonymous
affirmative
gay
deal
huge
much
part
root
black
wants
knows
puzzle
writes
answer
nobody
groups
action
concern
thinking
striking
treating
55:00
justice
role
chief
something
conservative
ideologically
end
pays
vote
fast
john
terms
court
cases
thomas
second
result
scalia
things
strong
taking
pivotal
roberts
provide
strongly
anything
believes
concerned
important
55:30
unconstitutional
amendment
affirmative
preclearance
incrementally
jurisdictions
cut
act
area
lord
step
baby
edges
thing
number
across
rights
action
voting
affords
subject
mention
decision
56:00
case
blood
driving
influence
docket
important
accent
practice
carefully
surprised
taking
believe
cover
grant
search
seizure
justices
warrior
coming
state
56:30
women
famously
none
hundreds
action
laughter
case
following
worked
thousands
asked
wal
interesting
terms
nobody
capable
cases
ago
class
mart
57:00
concerned
case
class
people
procedure
aggregates
en
wal
lot
big
put
air
mart
basra
masse
train
cases
appear
action
justice
actions
anybody
cutting
litigate
extorted
justices
business
together
community
expensive
57:30
case
fraud
people
certifying
securities
wal
interesting
tiny
mart
much
line
cases
class
thing
saying
figure
judges
damage
little
decide
trying
action
college
comcast
lawsuit
whether
everyone
consider
decision
question
together
procedure
58:00
cases
textbooks
overseas
interested
practicing
copyrighted
buy
moot
body
core
sold
five
court
issue
states
united
boyers
supreme
lawyers
happens
lawsuit
producer
actually
material
58:30
case
question
massachusetts
seriously
attention
challenging
pay
run
let
ask
till
moot
fact
claim
theme
kagan
folks
state
filed
cases
oddly
drama
nobody
docket
justice
recused
mention
principal
59:00
cases
inside
baseball
analysis
important
separately
two
case
nine
mean
court
judge
recuse
layers
system
detail
depend
appeals
decided
whether
district
question
combined
justices
59:30
role
likely
depend
anything
lot
question
touched
government
heavy
massachusetts
talking
state
type
enough
justices
since
case
guess
01:00:00
participate
convinced
obviously
government
involvement
massachusetts
bag
walk
vote
case
sure
fact
right
court
kerry
cases
class
shine
expect
pretty
either
actions
another
bromide
exactly
question
position
confident
available
01:00:30
people
000
class
business
community
litigating
10
100
yeah
okay
view
judge
thing
whole
notion
certify
lawsuit
thousand
pressure
together
ballgame
defendant
important
basically
extortion
certifying
01:01:00
front
securities
fraudulent
sympathetic
bankrupting
significantly
let
dogs
sure
case
lose
court
loose
stood
class
great
fraud
allow
before
judges
things
settle
action
decided
willing
concern
whether
pattern
material
statement
legitimate
01:01:30
law
damages
legal
stanford
commentary
georgetown
spans
nation
center
writing
harvard
two
much
case
court
today
clerk
theory
former
served
supreme
justice
anthony
advisor
counsel
kennedy
similar
attorney
previews
discussed
department
plaintiffs
01:02:00
find
cases
remembers
atypically
rake
federalist
predictions
talk
three
court
board
asked
review
member
nobody
honest
making
panels
supreme
society
perhaps
nervous
producer
produced
broadway
reckless
visitors
somewhat
remember
bit
delighted
sidelined
professor
01:02:30
dog
dogs
case
people
primarily
interested
men
seem
aldo
pair
named
front
cases
thing
fourth
called
respond
frankie
brought
jardine
kennedy
pending
question
petition
sniffing
amendment
01:03:00
door
case
house
inside
whatever
surge
smell
amendment
triggers
narcotics
god
knock
alert
trained
ways
sniff
signals
question
search
issue
opens
01:03:30
hand
court
searches
amendment
different
expressed
lot
dog
home
dogs
case
many
house
times
prior
within
fourth
search
concern
privacy
seizures
scrutiny
triggers
sniffing
01:04:00
court
house
cases
search
doubt
sniffing
kind
disappearing
thermal
dog
ve
houses
hand
roof
likely
imaging
walls
key
kilo
01:04:30
costs
search
trying
benefits
ate
exposing
privacy
difference
rather
dog
information
others
asked
secret
balance
key
keep
01:05:00
tells
contraband
intrusive
signature
imaginable
embarrassing
home
find
tell
else
heat
mean
point
house
least
might
drugs
thing
result
things
binding
strokes
nothing
careful
totally
whether
actually
anything
01:05:30
case
sniffing
stopping
involves
taillight
unanimous
car
easy
tell
sent
sort
docs
sadr
lady
house
thing
second
police
wouldn
pretty
harris
taking
called
deigned
officers
actually
surprise
01:06:00
car
dog
alerts
asking
officer
different
mouse
dimension
question
smith
searches
handle
dark
smell
trained
amendment
police
door
around
fourth
01:06:30
open
police
officer
information
constitute
apparently
car
dog
doc
guy
much
door
case
facts
bunch
cause
cases
sniff
enough
trying
search
inside
reasons
nervous
probable
policeman
suspicious
01:07:00
case
actually
government
constitute
persuasive
overreaches
lot
fine
easy
kind
trust
worry
court
smith
start
cause
likely
sounds
enough
stocks
tricky
search
pretty
supreme
trained
florida
probable
thinking
corporate
01:07:30
often
ultimately
statistics
government
petitioner
probabilistic
car
find
tell
okay
wait
odds
facts
court
farce
drugs
second
wanted
supreme
decided
inquiry
florida
training
programs
supposed
something
positives
01:08:00
dog
methamphetamines
happened
respondent
precursors
petitioner
door
open
find
case
often
sorry
alert
hands
people
spells
handle
things
alerts
visuals
trained
carrier
01:08:30
governor
marijuana
transfers
attendant
apparently
methamphetamines
gas
guy
door
size
mean
often
hands
allow
small
people
follow
smells
police
really
driver
garage
station
whatever
happened
residual
01:09:00
pick
false
sense
human
smell
better
dog
okay
doc
cuts
diet
dark
right
argue
humans
beings
smells
surely
positive
question
actually
probably
residual
constitutes
01:09:30
odds
statistics
government
overreaches
fingerprints
probabilistic
dna
bit
need
care
case
stats
brief
issue
court
thing
small
agreed
needed
needing
alerting
increase
residual
training
01:10:00
lot
puts
search
missteps
definition
conducting
dock
fact
wrong
thing
makes
fourth
rusher
theory
couple
matter
general
warrant
earlier
obvious
doctrine
probably
pressure
amendment
government
01:10:30
search
seriously
reasonable
comfortable
yes
unreasonable
circumstances
dog
text
door
took
dock
part
talk
crazy
house
check
seems
front
saying
fourth
cleaner
battery
another
warrant
journal
probably
searches
requires
amendment
happening
viciously
01:11:00
court
body
free
exclude
evidence
searches
dead
dad
car
bad
guy
send
gets
sorry
error
saying
really
somehow
letting
imagine
parlors
underway
criminal
doctrinal
01:11:30
search
actually
rule
big
puts
pressure
exactly
laughter
cases
hope
doctrines
missing
reasonable
habeas
dogs
exclusionary
corpus
talking
makes
third
01:12:00
tort
alien
statute
committed
violation
jurisdiction
20
old
law
case
room
civil
click
least
filed
statue
people
briefs
grants
united
treaty
amicus
courts
called
states
action
nations
district
original
01:12:30
foreign
folks
rights
bringing
defendant
plaintiff
odd
sat
170
kay
face
type
tour
civil
years
human
place
picked
ringing
started
enacted
dormant
congress
01:13:00
tort
case
sounds
courts
plaintiff
jurisdiction
odd
york
must
kind
alien
court
cases
place
raised
federal
strange
forward
statute
whether
paraguay
question
allowing
defendant
01:13:30
oil
companies
nigerian
government
foreign
complicit
works
particular
guy
keelboat
forth
treated
takes
nigeria
committed
helped
place
case
01:14:00
court
supreme
actually
defendants
corporation
corporations
sue
oil
case
last
claim
heard
apply
broader
parties
federal
company
unusual
statute
consider
argument
question
something
01:14:30
apply
court
issue
parties
question
extraterritorial
ask
eat
acts
much
land
brief
happen
bigger
broader
unusual
arguing
whether
notches
foreign
briefed
applies
actually
sovereigns
corporations
01:15:00
court
extraterritorial
suggests
solicitor
extending
sometimes
cut
far
eat
open
door
fact
sheer
scope
leave
thinks
extend
general
nervous
wanting
applied
statute
usually
strongly
everyone
question
cautious
01:15:30
rule
mostly
paraguay
state
set
legal
probably
advisers
generally
lead
particular
bracket
extraterritorial
case
former
actually
apply
yes
facts
01:16:00
might
cases
category
position
litigation
extraterritorial
sg
may
eat
door
case
apply
close
court
today
enough
entire
future
prevail
justice
clerked
kennedy
usually
01:16:30
case
spreads
doorknob
chemicals
neighbor
discovered
30
one
man
suit
hope
view
bond
brief
filed
affair
called
tacitus
pending
seconds
husband
compress
petition
01:17:00
weapons
congress
really
fit
targeting
kind
neighbor
assistant
story
ambitious
crime
attorney
convention
implementation
seems
imagine
chemical
try
state
fact
01:17:30
third
circuit
course
standing
treaty
power
argument
supreme
marriott
enact
last
consider
statute
yes
reason
whether
90
get
court
01:18:00
power
congress
promising
otherwise
legislation
automatically
put
find
kind
1820
point
seems
enact
finer
enter
comes
agree
treaty
foreign
country
treaties
increase
something
president
generally
01:18:30
regulate
whatever
congress
petition
violence
particular
mr
yes
cato
guns
urge
teed
rule
filed
crazy
court
seems
power
women
third
amicus
behalf
supreme
another
schools
circuit
suddenly
01:19:00
court
masquerade
admissions
hope
invitation
affirmative
tom
potentially
step
land
irks
civil
big
cases
thank
steps
uphold
strike
change
deal
school
honest
action
federal
picking
statute
blow
serious
question
workings
something
reluctant
seriously
next
eliminate
overrules
goldstein
01:19:30
rights
directions
definition
institution
traditional
incrementally
law
ago
act
five
years
sense
court
cases
steps
things
chance
groups
voting
notion
predict
prevail
justice
kennedy
pointing
marriage
different
difficult
absolutely
01:20:00
court
supreme
strongly
affirmative
conventional
substantially
act
move
tend
five
abode
terms
areas
drive
wisdom
change
faster
rights
action
voting
justice
section
believe
kennedy
survives
believes
surprised
unscathed
corresponds
01:20:30
big
looks
justice
roberts
surprised
affirmative
tom
shot
step
sent
suits
taken
thing
chief
steps
agree
comes
better
pretty
others
change
action
warning
overrule
formally
anything
01:21:00
pretty
feels
rights
voting
section
strongly
step
yes
big
ago
act
best
next
case
sure
goes
five
years
based
flawed
deeply
couple
austin
seattle
opinion
northwest
preclearance
01:21:30
step
congress
district
something
generally
signaling
ve
fix
lot
big
act
next
doma
room
many
court
taken
times
agree
rights
voting
ignores
opinion
tastings
01:22:00
step
big
whatever
overruling
protection
modification
lot
ways
call
case
room
right
equal
steps
small
chance
making
smaller
suspect
various
present
whether
existing
01:22:30
big
steps
step
often
necessary
oftentimes
jerk
stay
knee
kind
right
topic
small
reject
answer
extent
create
shouldn
grounds
activism
judicial
coherent
logically
anomalies
01:23:00
term
along
matter
justices
remarkable
apparently
end
let
ask
bush
hurt
gore
last
wake
happy
tomas
terms
today
happen
versus
everyone
feelings
headline
question
possible
somewhat
capacity
surprised
forgotten
01:23:30
really
intensity
certainly
essential
ultimately
understanding
lot
crew
case
court
folks
shows
terms
along
thing
makes
easier
others
unlike
despite
dynamic
clerked
picture
matters
whether
function
01:24:00
people
opinion
sometimes
coherent
essential
successful
law
four
five
rule
nine
point
three
views
along
agree
chief
willed
except
setter
strong
impart
diverse
justice
willing
exactly
getting
footnote
01:24:30
quick
anything
role
personal
formal
evidence
bush
variable
clerks
antagonism
rules
saw
play
relationships
gotten
residual
seven
set
gore
side
01:25:00
01:25:30
right
enough
whereby
terms
much
shown
thoughts
justice
plausible
chief
doubt
questions
roberts
speculation
thinks
agree
others
wingnut
throw
stuff
01:26:00
political
president
obama
microphone
government
let
journalists
opportunities
might
offer
cases
panel
rare
sound
forums
issues
chance
points
comment
josh
another
someone
earthly
debates
whether
anybody
well
dressed
politico
ll
argument
upcoming
gerstein
question
score
business
discussed
wondering
hi
01:26:30
court
supreme
undecided
motivator
something
independent
bit
try
play
care
case
onto
among
radar
takes
space
polls
voters
little
health
public
oxygen
gotten
either
broader
affairs
economy
foreign
election
committee
reference
01:27:00
care
health
conservative
presidential
act
administration
constitutionality
seem
much
point
obama
thing
romney
debate
defend
unlike
social
replace
defense
justice
defends
retires
example
question
allotted
salience
ginsburg
marriage
practical
lot
resonates
president
happening
01:27:30
action
political
affirmative
profit
1996
attacking
figure
remarkable
attacked
major
republicans
given
90s
publicly
seen
happen
kind
national
since
01:28:00
90s
early
republican
democratic
preferences
politicians
joe
gone
john
ever
stop
road
kerry
raise
maybe
polls
spoken
voices
racial
answer
others
inching
council
anymore
democrats
lieberman
leadership
01:28:30
209
worth
action
affirmative
proposition
preferences
lot
gave
part
fair
1996
cost
people
hassle
really
better
bitter
campaign
opposing
demagogy
incredibly
ironically
supporters
california
demonizing
01:29:00
questions
gentleman
lieberman
attacking
politicians
affirmative
yes
joe
gosh
sort
fact
right
front
jesse
bloody
result
better
backed
action
backing
jackson
reasons
rethink
campaign
01:29:30
southwest
anacostia
otherwise
microphone
bipartisan
understand
wait
gets
word
room
hear
legal
metro
saying
curious
working
advisor
freeway
obvious
everyone
apologize
currently
wondering
01:30:00
case
court
enforce
defending
periodically
substantially
group
basis
party
shows
wants
argue
defend
courts
expand
supreme
defense
allowed
curious
regular
statute
example
stronger
something
intervene
01:30:30
part
01:31:30
much
cases
thing
question
took
days
interest
supreme
happening
kinds
saw
administration
court
right
early
poirier
ask
bush
01:32:00
sort
matter
reaction
things
respected
quarter
addressed
cases
aftermath
11
general
controversial
crisis
settling
well
01:32:30
different
consensus
administration
throughout
especially
haphazardly
11
end
lot
ways
bush
part
last
many
years
terms
views
given
obama
issues
things
reasons
settled
response
political
stabilize
01:33:00
prediction
retirement
contingent
extenuating
voluntarily
circumstances
end
bit
act
feel
next
ends
term
thank
issue
older
forced
little
things
health
depends
several
getting
campaign
national
retiring
concerns
justices
security
president
obviously
01:33:30
justice
record
place
kennedy
court
long
retiring
trying
thing
ginsburg
mitt
2014
honorable
stayed
term
accomplished
scalia
romney
pointed
retire
might
01:34:00
president
court
shift
replacing
considering
conservative
huge
based
obama
makes
romney
anyone
chance
supreme
justice
appoint
kennedy
balance
majority
possibly
certainly
potential
01:34:30
later
behalf
seem
four
pretty
worry
healthy
pick
join
challenge
years
production
none
retirements
great
always
fun
turn
01:35:00
coming
behalf
lot
thinking
thanking
inaudible
conversations
panel
01:35:30
initiate
something
countries
prosperity
developing
enterprise
00
11
pax
dean
span
call
east
free
race
faces
watch
order
senate
middle
debate
market
heller
foster
tonight
watched
shelley
eastern
berkley
closely
01:36:00
freedom
self
barriers
developing
program
investment
determination
private
sector
entrepreneurship
working
entrepreneurialism
believe
trade
identify
nations
unique
01:36:30
people
values
american
one
ultimately
culture
government
convinced
individual
simply
opportunity
stability
bring
likely
universal
prosperity
peace
basis
serves
01:37:00
span
debate
president
wednesday
jim
presidential
administration
org
news
next
live
mitt
hour
meet
mails
watch
obama
calls
radio
romney
follow
suites
engage
lehrer
federal
preview
october
planning
aviation
reactions
including
moderated
01:37:30
hearing
hours
subject
commence
ground
discussed
based
transition
house
subcommittee
gps
radar
nextgen
01:38:00
colleague
management
governments
subcommittee
stakeholders
transforming
air
faa
able
hear
today
begin
known
system
toward
control
program
suspect
opening
shortly
nextgen
nations
benefit
traffic
progress
finished
aviation
industry
statement
01:38:30
air
system
inefficient
implementation
transportation
competitiveness
730
today
works
order
global
public
future
control
nations
largest
million
traffic
roughly
project
history
critical
ambitious
successful
passengers
marketplace
accommodate
01:39:00
system
controllers
surveillance
000
transitioning
transportation
communications
air
less
need
goal
based
start
lives
safer
create
better
finish
routes
pilots
weather
nextgen
impacted
transform
modernize
efficient
satellite
improving
conditions
70
developing
navigation
environment
01:39:30
faa
industry
implement
consistent
challenges
significant
call
equip
fewer
faces
delays
invest
develop
billion
nextgen
dollars
billions
spending
progress
aircraft
aviation
benefits
01:40:00
faa
discuss
nextgen
progress
witnesses
transformational
of
major
focus
today
users
slower
result
organs
invest
hearing
derived
airspace
likewise
expected
benefits
industry
reluctant
delivered
challenges
unfortunately
transportation
01:40:30
clear
succeed
congress
reports
programs
wants
outlined
facing
accounting
many
implementation
office
general
faa
01:41:00
hard
major
nextgen
programs
expensive
infrastructure
like
01:41:30
today
involved
must
overcome
job
forward
witnesses
challenges
end
hearing
cooperation
participation
depends
everyone
thank
done
faa
01:42:00
without
objection
statements
legislative
recognizing
subcommittee
mr
ask
six
let
days
turn
five
years
manage
better
record
advise
making
consent
ordered
working
include
members
remarks
chairman
costello
situation
witnesses
01:42:30
ensure
together
basis
costello
nextgen
recognize
move
continues
provide
oversight
bipartisan
proper
forward
mr
01:43:00
chairman
mr
record
project
undertake
department
faa
ever
stay
many
major
years
thank
enter
worked
formal
correct
closely
nextgen
together
statement
difficult
attempted
01:43:30
side
aisle
members
congress
consulted
committees
chairman
subcommittees
overview
general
learn
watching
committee
things
taken
since
01:44:00
chairman
calling
appreciate
fair
truly
bipartisan
publicly
side
friendship
mr
thank
established
partner
subcommittee
hearing
aisle
reeking
courtesies
better
today
member
01:44:30
nextgen
keep
involved
committees
accountable
subcommittee
past
held
need
best
plan
room
many
track
times
people
uphold
chaired
actions
develop
monitor
certain
everyone
progress
multiple
discussed
implement
01:45:00
system
people
involved
table
consulted
billion
concerned
clear
discussions
design
stakeholders
multi
dollar
thought
bomb
try
crazy
01:45:30
terms
layman
nextgen
describe
couldn
involving
faa
individual
taxpayer
operate
cannot
system
describes
asked
money
using
01:46:00
hope
hearings
together
additional
subcommittee
stakeholders
lot
held
long
next
knew
hold
days
fact
point
early
hands
since
number
future
certain
working
problem
everyone
achieved
chairman
progress
congress
involved
committee
01:46:30
mr
chairman
thank
hearing
leadership
subcommittee
long
stay
trust
looking
provide
holding
forward
balance
actively
involved
yielding
costello
witnesses
oversight
necessary
initiative
01:47:00
bill
presided
aviation
without
committee
help
difficult
great
leadership
faa
reauthorization
pass
february
14
01:47:30
faa
house
blueprint
important
authorization
passing
candy
unfortunately
aspects
components
senate
extensions
white
side
17
flowers
build
legislation
stalled
formal
01:48:00
bill
progress
february
framework
milestones
desperately
put
move
need
find
loss
hold
since
might
blame
folks
found
people
review
needed
charge
looking
forward
provided
provides
01:48:30
leadership
satellite
important
management
advancement
administrative
ii
for
faa
act
21st
post
might
world
roles
system
policy
moving
taking
toward
provide
program
insight
congress
requires
executive
01:49:00
near
thing
misses
simple
aircraft
close
occurrences
common
unfortunately
system
flying
century
weeks
ago
01:49:30
air
couple
decades
realize
fortune
incident
today
redoubling
ground
congestion
major
planes
traffic
next
01:50:00
frankly
combined
shame
lack
acted
highlight
running
inspector
large
lose
blueprints
general
leadership
report
place
bureaucratic
earlier
congress
number
lives
acting
01:50:30
place
getting
forward
excuses
equipment
tried
stalemate
policy
acceptable
fails
technology
period
aspects
move
faa
01:51:00
need
certain
software
funding
equipment
hardware
developed
fashion
everything
systems
expeditious
place
forward
deployed
keep
moving
01:51:30
faa
sector
private
technology
development
someone
milestones
step
forefront
job
blueprint
law
meeting
developing
better
set
keep
01:52:00
relies
contest
might
hearing
safety
finally
ahead
feet
slightly
future
aviation
fire
additional
flying
public
hold
01:52:30
contest
bureaucracy
others
generation
air
worse
dominating
traffic
technology
trying
next
constraints
grosser
union
control
european
done
win
field
01:53:00
future
systems
equipment
long
important
slightly
estimation
nation
jobs
opportunity
aviation
domestically
world
term
economic
software
ahead
whole
01:53:30
shortcomings
check
general
forward
move
process
critical
inspector
intend
unfortunately
world
need
today
mission
count
mark
hear
01:54:00
thank
faa
fire
holding
texas
committee
feet
representativefrom
hearing
yield
year
people
hold
speak
chairman
mr
much
01:54:30
air
based
traffic
transitioning
environmental
reauthorization
gps
able
bill
skies
system
safety
nation
nexgen
content
address
nextgen
airspace
national
reducing
controls
transport
transform
satellite
increased
improving
congestion
management
footprints
modification
modernization
01:55:00
omissions
potential
cut
metroplex
successful
significant
implementation
may
fuel
jobs
boost
prime
light
allow
reduce
growth
market
dallas
delays
system
enable
extend
control
engines
economy
harmful
example
creation
addition
aircraft
aviation
benefits
01:55:30
comes
pains
located
area
growing
politan
anything
efficiency
travel
metropolitan
joe
areas
shorter
times
busy
01:56:00
funding
decreases
passengers
20
environment
significant
investments
tag
yet
faa
next
fuel
2012
2025
hefty
price
comes
making
private
billion
federal
january
nextgen
savings
upgrades
addition
airlines
advances
aircraft
27
estimate
industry
omissions
01:56:30
member
committee
council
house
technology
substantial
recognize
invest
investments
ranking
must
reauthorization
avionics
skies
cleaner
require
safer
congested
less
making
01:57:00
concerned
department
automation
understand
implementation
transportation
330
end
four
must
years
route
wisely
report
invest
slipped
million
general
budgeted
schedule
addition
inspector
01:57:30
thank
implement
technology
developing
performance
difficulties
need
next
john
turn
terry
today
panel
yield
member
agency
debbie
hearing
forward
ranking
welcome
metrics
believe
nextgen
calling
chairman
witnesses
honorable
testimony
01:58:00
department
transportation
acting
secretary
billingham
both
regulars
administrator
infrastructure
faa
general
gerald
welcome
physical
panel
part
01:58:30
thank
deputy
prepared
staff
five
secretary
minutes
questions
turn
statement
morning
summarize
begin
effort
invited
office
went
panel
01:59:00
largest
nextgen
transportation
investments
subcommittee
infrastructure
won
air
mike
talk
today
world
global
states
united
system
safety
leader
legend
strives
members
enhance
aviation
chairman
progress
department
recognized
continually
01:59:30
based
reduce
delays
bottlenecks
improvements
2020
surveillance
shows
world
states
growth
happen
ground
united
foster
safety
moving
30
future
century
relieve
improve
country
nextgen
21st
airline
traffic
forecast
expected
compared
commerce
last
anything
passenger
satellite
02:00:00
need
within
someone
stakeholders
technologies
transformation
20
job
faa
done
next
kind
many
right
years
forge
system
handle
double
public
concept
reality
complex
require
nextgen
prepares
associated
challenges
leadership
outstanding
02:00:30
leadership
faa
acquisition
professional
partnerships
administrator
pass
need
hand
ahead
steer
seeing
senate
manage
proven
change
steady
remain
already
nextgen
results
hopeful
applaud
michael
changes
positive
programs
direction
structure
management
02:01:00
gulf
industry
satellite
helicopter
surveillance
collaboration
gas
faa
gives
serve
whale
chief
seeing
mexico
images
precise
already
largest
company
greater
nextgen
coverage
02:01:30
greater
partnered
technology
ap
conditions
visibility
efficiency
10
per
low
100
faa
fly
quit
much
fuel
save
ideas
better
safety
flight
pounds
allows
weather
jetblue
located
exactly
minutes
example
enhances
provides
aircraft